Fair road pricing or algorithmic strangulation? A perspective

Fair road pricing or algorithmic strangulation? A perspective
Martijn Versteegen
·
January 26, 2026
·
2 mins
Martijn Versteegen analyzes the risks of pay-per-mile road tax and why predictable, transparent data is vital for fleet managers and the EV transition.
Fair road pricing or algorithmic strangulation? A perspective

TL;DR: As governments move toward "pay-per-mile" road pricing to replace declining fuel duties, we face a choice: use technology to steer better behavior or turn it into an unpredictable revenue-grab. For the automotive industry, the key to success is moving away from "dynamic" pricing toward predictable, transparent data.

The era of "dumb" vehicle taxation is coming to an end. For decades, governments relied on a steady stream of income from purchase taxes, annual road tax, and fuel levies. But as Electric Vehicles (EVs) go mainstream - a transition we all want - that revenue is disappearing because EVs don't pay fuel excise duties. 

The replacement? Road-usage charging, or "pay-per-mile." While often pitched as the "fairest" system ever devised, there is a hidden danger that could strike at the very backbone of our economy.

Executive summary: The road pricing dilemma

| The Vision | The Risk: "Algorithmic Strangulation" | The Solution: Predictable Clarity | |------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Congestion Relief: Lower costs for driving clean cars off-peak. | Revenue Over-Optimization: Prices that change in real-time like flight tickets. | Fixed Tariffs: Transparent rates set for a predictable period (e.g., one year). | | Predictable Planning: A dream for TCO-driven fleet managers. | Unpredictable TCO: Impossible to sign long-term leases when costs fluctuate daily. | Impact-Based Pricing: Fair levies based on road impact, not just drivetrain. |

The danger of real-time revenue grabs

The seductive vision of road pricing is a country without congestion. But my concern is what happens when this algorithm isn't used to guide behavior, but to plug budget deficits.

If the price per mile begins to fluctuate minute-by-minute based on real-time demand, we enter a state of algorithmic strangulation.

  • Necessity vs. luxury: Movement isn't a luxury. A teacher cannot choose when the school day starts, and a service technician must reach customers regardless of peak-hour surcharges.
  • The "cash cow" risk: These essential workers become the cash cows of an automated system they cannot escape. 

Why stability is the backbone of business

For a fleet manager or a leasing company, the single most important factor is the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). You cannot sign a four-year contract when the cost of usage is a moving target controlled by a "black box" algorithm.

In the UK, the Treasury is already preparing to introduce a pay-per-mile tax specifically for EVs to replace lost fuel duty. While this is a step toward a new model, applying it only to electric vehicles risks undermining the transition to cleaner transport. Fairness must be based on the impact a vehicle has on the road, not its drivetrain.

Perspective: the path to fair road usage

Technology is merely an instrument; how we use it defines our success. To make road pricing work, we must prioritize predictability and trust through three core principles:

  1. Eliminate minute-by-minute dynamics: We must move away from prices that change constantly. Tariffs should be transparent and fixed for at least a year.
  2. Focus on steering, not punishment: Use surcharges for urban peak hours and discounts for EVs to encourage better choices, but keep these rules clear and plan-able. 
  3. Visual consistency in data: Whether you are configuring a car or planning a route, you need stable, visually consistent data to make an informed decision.

Key takeaways

  • The revenue gap: Governments are moving to pay-per-mile to replace lost fuel duties from the EV transition.
  • TCO risk: Real-time dynamic pricing makes business planning and long-term leasing impossible.
  • Essential movement: We must protect those who cannot choose their driving times from being unfairly taxed.
  • Transparency first: Fair pricing requires fixed, clear tariffs that allow fleet managers genuine freedom of choice.

Ready to Transform Your Car Imagery?

Our plug-and-play car image API provides access to high-quality car visuals for every model, in every angle..
5000+ car models covered
Custom branding
2025 Mercedes-AMG EQS

Check out all our thought leadership

The "wild west" of EV charging: why price transparency is the next great automotive hurdle
CEO Martijn Versteegen explores the hidden costs of EV charging and why visual clarity and data fidelity are essential for the future of fleet management.
The efficiency trap: why bigger batteries aren’t the answer for EVs
CEO Martijn Versteegen explains why the auto industry must prioritize EV energy efficiency over battery size to reduce costs and environmental impact.
Beyond the battery: solving the bi-directional headache for modern fleets
Bi-directional charging turns EVs into power plants but creates a billing nightmare for fleets. Learn how to bridge the gap with data-driven management.

Ready to Transform Your Car Imagery?

Our plug-and-play car image API provides access to high-quality car visuals for every model, in every angle..
5000+ car models covered
Custom branding
2025 Mercedes-AMG EQS